» Eliza Presley
» DNA
» ElizaPresley.org
» FAQ
» Our Domains
ElizaPresley.org ElizaPresley.net ElizaPresley.info ElizaAPresley.com ElizaAlicePresley.com
» Stats
Members: 9,394
Threads: 44
Posts: 45
Top Poster: Administrator (43)
Welcome to our newest member, phlebotomyd07
» Donate
If You Like This Website And Would Like To Help Us Keep It Going, You Can Make A Donation.

Your Donation Will Be Used To Pay For:

• Domain Registration

• Hosting Service

• Maintenance Costs


$


Select Your Donation Amount And Then Press The Donate Button.




 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
(#1)
Old
Administrator Offline
*** Administrator ***
 
Posts: 43
Join Date: Jul 2009
Default DNA Testing - 07-31-2009, 07:36 PM

DNA Testing In Chronological Order:

November 2000: Donna Presley Early, Elvis’ 1st cousin, Paternal and myself.
Results [lab #1]: It was determined that we were related and that EP (Elvis Presley) “could NOT BE EXCLUDED as being my biological father”. That if it wasn’t him, it’d be someone very closely related, that I was in fact a Presley by birth.

April 2005: Samples from (unverified) linens, sold online as having been used by Elvis Presley in 1977 and myself.
Results [lab #2]: It was determined that the results were NOT CONSISTENT for paternity.

June 2005: Samples from (unverified) linens, sold online as having been used by Elvis Presley in 1977 and myself.
Results [lab #3]: It was determined that the results were NOT CONSISTENT for paternity. It was further determined that I was not related to the samples from the (unverified) linens. Those results were verified by the DNA consulting firm in Arizona.

August 2006: Tim Farrell of Michigan and myself. Tim was another (possible) illegitimate child of Elvis Presley that had gone public with his search.
Results [lab #4]: It was determined that Tim & I are not half-siblings. The probability of us being siblings was calculated to be 0.22%, at best. It was further stated that we are COMPLETELY UNRELATED.

April 2008: The ‘Jesse’ buccal cheek swab results from Suzanne Stratford of Fox 8 News Cleveland, dated 2002 and myself.
Results [lab #5]: It was determined that the results were NOT CONSISTENT for paternity.

April 2008: The ‘Jesse’ buccal cheek swab results from Suzanne Stratford of Fox 8 News Cleveland, dated 2002 and myself.
Results [lab #5]: It was determined that ‘Jesse’ & I are half-siblings. The probability of us being siblings was calculated to be 1.63 x 10 5 in favor of kinship, sharing one parent. Those results were verified by the DNA consulting firm in Arizona.

April 2008: Donna Presley Early, Elvis’ 1st cousin, Paternal and myself.
Results [lab #5]: It verified the findings from November of 2000 & that it was determined to be 31.95 times in favor of kinship.

April 2008: Jesse with Donna Early Presley, Elvis’ 1st cousin, Paternal.
Results [lab #5]: It was determined to be 45.7 times in favor of kinship. Those results verified by the DNA consulting firm in Arizona.

April 2008: ‘Jesse’ with Brenda Smith Ivy, Elvis’ 1st cousin, Maternal.
Results [lab #5]: It was determined to be 41.8 times in favor of kinship. Those results verified by the DNA consulting firm in Arizona.

April 2008: The ‘Jesse’ buccal cheek swab results from Suzanne Stratford of Fox 8 News Cleveland, dated 2002 and Tim Farrell.
Results [lab #5]: It was determined that the results were NOT CONSISTENT for paternity. No other comparisons were done since the only relationship ever claimed was as a (possible) child of Elvis Presley.

August 2008: Debbie K. L., Eliza’s 1 st cousin, Maternal.
Results: [lab#5]: It was determined that Eliza’s 1 st cousin, Maternal, showed approximately the same ratio for kinship as Eliza to Elvis’ 1 st cousin, Donna Presley Early, Paternal. This test being performed since Debbie K.L. is a known 1 st cousin on the maternal side. Debbie is the niece of Florence J. Sharp.

August 2008: ‘Pink envelope with pictures of Elvis Presley on it sent to Eliza Presley July 2008 by Jesse G. Presley’* against the Fox 8 News Cleveland, ‘Jesse’ results from 2002.
Results [lab #5]: The two samples share a similar DNA fingerprint and CANNOT BE EXCLUDED as coming from the same source. Final conclusion was that the ‘Jesse’ sample from 2002 & 2008 were from the same individual.
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

» Online Users: 17
6 members and 11 guests
Bumboxbarash, KadoshEirik, nuskeeplile, phlebotomyd07, wrincilioreon, ZacharySanjeev
Most users ever online was 172, 06-06-2010 at 11:59 PM.
» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» September 2010
S M T W T F S
293031 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 12
» Advertisements


Copyright © 2009 ElizaPresley.org All Rights Reserved.
Web Design By • CheykaWebDesign.com